Aleksandr Drevinの肖像画

ギャラリー厳選、Aleksandr Drevinによる最も有名な2の絵画

11月 2026 更新 · 当サイトの人気スコア(各作品の検索数、閲覧数、注文数)に基づくランキング · 2点の Aleksandr Drevinの作品がカタログにあります

要約すると

Aleksandr Drevinが遺したオリジナル作品の中で最も有名なものは、リガのLatvian National Museum of Artに収蔵されているWoman with Leaflets (1933)です。 Aleksandr Drevinによる2点の作品をカタログに掲載しています。当ギャラリーでは、世界が称賛する2点を選定し、制作年、所蔵美術館、そしてその背景にある物語とともにご紹介しています。

1889 – 1938, Cēsis 最多収蔵館: Latvian National Museum of Art

Aleksandr Drevinの代表作10選:ギャラリー厳選の作品集

Aleksandr Drevinの原画を所蔵する美術館

このページに掲載されている絵画を最も多く所蔵している 2 の美術館

美術館 都市 Aleksandr Drevinの作品 このリストの絵画
Latvian National Museum of Art, リガLatvian National Museum of Art リガ 1 Woman with Leaflets
Yale University Art Gallery, ニューヘイブンYale University Art Gallery ニューヘイブン 1 Suprematism (formerly) Abstraction

Aleksandr Drevinの歩み:その時代を象徴するオリジナル作品

1921年から1933年までの13年間にわたり、Aleksandr Drevinによる各年の最高傑作のオリジナル作品を厳選しています。

年別作品数

年代を選択して、当時のオリジナル作品を見る

Aleksandr Drevinの絵画に関するコレクターからの質問

Aleksandr Drevinの代表作は何ですか?答えを見る

Woman with Leaflets (1933)

Woman with Leafletsが制作されたとき、Aleksandr Drevinは何歳でしたか?答えを見る

44歳:Woman with Leafletsは1933年の作品で、Aleksandr Drevinの生年は1889年です。

Aleksandr Drevinが遺した作品数は?答えを見る

当カタログには、1921年から1933年にかけて制作されたAleksandr Drevinによる2点の作品が収められています。

Aleksandr Drevinの名作は、どの美術館に収蔵されていますか?答えを見る

主にLatvian National Museum of Art (リガ) と Yale University Art Gallery (ニューヘイブン)に所蔵されています。上記の美術館一覧にすべて記載されています。

Aleksandr Drevinによる最初と最後の代表的なオリジナル作品は何ですか?答えを見る

このページでは、最も古い作品はSuprematism (formerly) Abstraction (1921)、最新の作品はWoman with Leaflets (1933)です。

Aleksandr Drevin:生涯と作品

The Quiet Rebellion of a Painter

In the quiet streets of Cēsis, within the Governorate of Livonia, a life began that would eventually trace the turbulent contours of a changing century. Born in 1889, this Latvian painter first sought to capture the world through the soft, light-filled lens of impressionism, honing his craft under the guidance of Vilhelms Purvītis in Riga. By 1914, the pull of Moscow drew him into a new, more intense atmosphere of creative ferment. It was here that his brushwork began to shift, influenced by the teachings of Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin, moving away from the gentle observations of his youth toward something far more structural and profound.

His path was never a straight line, but rather a series of departures and intense engagements with the spirit of his age. He moved through the avant-garde circles of the time, finding a temporary home within the "Green Flower" association alongside fellow artists like Konrāds Ubāns and Valdemārs Tone. Yet, the restless energy of the era often demanded a choice between the traditional and the radical. He found himself at the heart of the Inkhuk group, only to walk away from it alongside figures like Wassily Kandinsky, driven by a desire to reject the mere decoration of easel painting in favor of a more direct, constructivist approach to form.

A Search for the Essential Form

As the years progressed, his work underwent a profound transformation, shedding the layers of illusionism that had once defined his training. He became a professor of painting at Vkhutemas, sharing his evolving vision with a new generation of students. His travels took him across the vast expanse of the Soviet landscape, from the rugged terrain of Kazakhstan and the Ural mountains to the heights of Altai and the landscapes of Armenia. These expeditions were not merely sightseeing trips but were essential to his development as he sought to document the raw reality of the land.

His style during this period was characterized by a certain "brutal primitivism," a term that captures his rejection of the polished and the ornamental. He sought a truth that was stripped of political messaging or decorative intent, focusing instead on the weight and presence of the subject. His evolution can be traced through several distinct phases:

  • The early impressionist studies of his Riga years.
  • A period of constructivist abstraction that challenged the traditional boundaries of the canvas.
  • A return to a progressive realism in the 1920s, where the subject matter became more grounded and tangible.

The Shadow of History

The personal and the political became inextricably linked in the final years of his life. In 1919, he married Nadezhda Udaltsova, a union that would link their lives through the complexities of the Soviet art world. Their son, Andrey Drevin, would eventually find his own way as a sculptor, carrying forward a legacy that had been marked by both intense creativity and profound tragedy. The very landscapes Aleksandr had traveled so far to capture were being reshaped by the heavy hand of history.

The end came abruptly during the Great Purge. In January 1938, as part of the Latvian Operation, he was arrested by the NKVD. He was executed in February of that same year at the Butovo firing range near Moscow. It was only decades later, in 1957, that he was posthumously rehabilitated, finally allowing his name to be viewed through the lens of his art rather than the violence of his death. His work remains a record of a man who sought to strip away the unnecessary, searching for a reality that was both stark and deeply felt.